Showing posts with label Planning Proposals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Planning Proposals. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Rotherhithe – Canary Wharf Bridge short-listed in New London Awards 2016

One of the designs proposed for a much-needed pedestrian and cycle bridge between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf has been short-listed in the Transport and Infrastructure of the New London Awards 2016.   The Rotherhithe Bridge design is proposed by Sustrans and the reForm/Elliott Wood team and the website dedicated to the structure, complete with animations, can be found at:  http://www.rotherhithebridge.london.
 
Over 130 projects across 15 categories have been shortlisted for the New London Awards 2016, recognising the very best new and proposed architecture, planning and development in the capital.  In conjunction with the London Festival of Architecture, Londoners are invited to select their favourite from the shortlist for the People’s Choice Award. All category winners, Overall Winner and the New Londoner of the Year will be announced on 7 July at the NLA Annual Lunch at the Guildhall, attended by 700 of the capital’s leading decision-makers and professionals across development, design, planning and construction.

To see all the projects short-listed in the Transport and Infrastructure category see: http://www.newlondonarchitecture.org/docs/transport__infrastructure_2016.pdf (opens as a PDF).


How to Vote

Votes can be cast throughout June in one of three alternative ways:

1. Visit the NLA galleries at The Building Centre and fill in one of the voting cards

2. View the full shortlist online of projects in the category (opens as a PDF). Then tweet your choice from your own Twitter account by entering the following into the Componse New Tweet field:  “I vote for  ……….  #NLAwards16 @nlalondon” (where the dots are Rotherhithe Bridge)

3. Email info@newlondonarchitecture.org with “I vote for Rotherhithe Bridge – Transport Infrastructure in the New London Awards”

Sunday, February 7, 2016

Notes re Canada Water Masterplan exhibtion 5th February 2016


I've at last written up some thoughts re the Canada Water Masterplan as revealed on Friday 5th February 2016 at British Land's exhibition in Surrey Quays Shopping Centre. Not my happiest day of the year to date

Friday, February 5, 2016

Canada Water Area Action Plan exhibition 5th February 2016

Update:  The full story with more pictures is now on my SE16 planning blog at: https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2016/02/07/canada-water-masterplan-exhibition-on-5th-february-2016/

I said that I would put all my planning stuff on my other blog, and I will do so with a commentary, but in the meantime, whilst I try to feel a bit less depressed about the whole thing and get my head around what I want to say, here are some images of what they have planned for us after their planned 15 years of construction traffic, noise, dirt and chaos.  Basically, they are telling us to kiss the Rotherhithe we know goodbye.

I took the photos at today's exhibition at Surrey Quays Shopping Centre.  There were loads of information boards and booklets, and apparently these should be on a website somewhere but I haven't yet gone looking.

The type-written labels superimposed on the photos are mine, which I added to help people orientate themselves.  Much of it is so unrecognizable that if it wasn't for Greenland Dock, Canada Water and Southwark Park it would be difficult to know exactly where you were.

Click on any image to see the bigger version.










Saturday, January 30, 2016

Notes from South Dock consultation (St George’s Wharf) 30th January 2016

More planning stuff.  I've written up my notes from this morning's planning meeting re the St George's Wharf development at South Dock at:
https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2016/01/30/south-dock-consultation-st-georges-wharf-30th-january-2016/

I hope you enjoy reading my notes rather more than I enjoyed writing them, but I suspect not :-)




Tuesday, January 26, 2016

South Dock & Surrounding Facebook page

For those of you who live in the vicinity of South Dock, there's a Facebook page that is aiming to become a central information resource for local people on the downriver (eastern) side of Rotherhithe peninsula. 

At the moment the majority of posts are understandably about planning issues (the hugely controversial St George's Wharf development) but the intention is to include anything that may be of local interest.  Keeping up with local matters is never easy, so pages like this are always very welcome.  You can find it at:  https://www.facebook.com/SouthDockandSurrounding







Monday, January 25, 2016

Upcoming consultation workshop for the South Dock Marina

The latest consultation workshop for the South Dock Marina is on 30th January - you must have a ticket .

Sunday, January 24, 2016

Planning and development issues - a new home

I've moved planning issues to a new home, a dedicated blog called "trackerzone" (a name that is explained over there, but has nothing at all to do with planning).  All the local history and other posts were getting completely lost in the general torrent of planning issues, so it seemed like time for a change. I figured that for people interested in local history it would be frustrating to wade through planning posts, and for people interested in planning, local history posts would be distracting, so I've separated them out.

I will continue to let people know where when there are new planning updates on the other blog, but I will no longer post the full contents here. 

I have copied a year's worth of planning posts from this blog over there (the formatting is still a bit odd on the older posts, but all the content is there and the formatting will be sorted soon)

You will find four new posts on the new blog, which have not been posted here, as follows.

Bermondsey and Rotherhithe Community Council Agenda 27th January 2016 (with a link to the agenda and minutes of the last meeting)
https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/bermondsey-and-rotherhithe-community-council-27th-january-2016
Letter from Southwark Council re location for new Leisure Centre (with photographs of the letter)
https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/letter-from-southwark-council-re-leisure-centre-location-consultation

Canada Water Area Action Plan Newsletter February 2016 (with scans of the newsletter)
https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/canada-water-area-action-campaign-newsletter-february-2016

Leisure Centre to be discussed at Community Council Meeting – Can you attend?
https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/leisure-centre-to-be-discussed-at-community-council-meeting-can-you-attend


Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Sunday, December 6, 2015

Planning round-up W/E 6th December 2015

This post, which has updates on the New Southwark Plan Preferred option, the Revised Canada Water Area Action Plan, The Lavender Pumphouse, the Ship York and the South Dock boatyard has been moved onto a website dedicated to SE16 planning issues and can now be found at the following website address:

https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2015/12/06/planning-round-up-we-6th-december-2015

Thursday, November 26, 2015

A round-up of planning matters in Rotherhithe peninsula

This post has now moved to its new location on the trackerzone blog about planning and development in SE16.

You can find it here, along with all the previous planning and develoopment posts that have appeared on this blog:

https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2015/11/26/british-land-walkabout-re-proposals-for-the-new-surrey-quays-shopping-parade
.
.
.

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Update: South Dock development boatyard workshop



This post has now been moved over to my sister planning and development blog at:

https://trackerzone.wordpress.com/2015/11/24/58/

Sustrans Brunel Bridge - News?

I've just seen a link from RotherhitheWhatsOn (on Twitter @WorgInfo) to the Londonist website where five innovative ideas for the future of London are mentioned.  They were apparently discussed in a conference earlier this week.  I did wonder if something about the bridge had been aired recently because a journalist contacted me yesterday to ask if I had an opinion on the subject on the bridge.  The Londonist article (at ) states that Annette Jezierska from Sustrans estimates 30,000 new jobs in Canary Wharf and 20,000 new homes becoming available at Canary Wharf alone and goes on to ask "Canada Water station is already logjammed during peak hours; how on earth is it going to cope with all these new people?"  As the Londonist page says, one of the proposed solutions to the traffic and public transport problems is the Brunel Bridge, which would go from Durand's Wharf on Rotherhithe to Canary Wharf.

Earlier this year Sustrans was given £200,000 to research the proposal in detail but I have not heard of the output from this research project having been published, and without seeing precisely what is being proposed it is a bit difficult to form any sort of opinion about the viability, the logistics and the impacts.

There's a story about it today on The Guardian website:  http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/nov/24/revealed-the-new-thames-bridge-proposal-thats-a-no-brainer 

When anyone hears anything new about the bridge I'd be grateful for any updates.  My email address is in the header at the top of the blog if you would like to get in touch.  

The Brunel Bridge website is at: http://brunelbridge.london/.


Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Is it a bird? Is it a crane? No, it's affordable housing.

I've rarely heard anything so thoroughly silly.

Southwark Council are apparently now arguing that restoring the red derrick (crane) on the Thames Path at Odessa Street would take funding away from the provision of affordable housing.  How on earth would the drop-in-the-ocean costs of partially restoring the derrick deprive Rotherhithe of affordable housing??? 

Have your say, and vote on the future of the historic Odessa St crane in the Southwark News survey at



View of Commercial Wharf with the
Scotch derrick in the background,
1982. With thanks to Malcom T.
Tucker for the photograph.

Saturday, November 14, 2015

South Dock / St George's Wharf Development - Any Update re November workshop?

This post has now moved to my sister blog, which focuses on planning and development, and can be found at:

http://wp.me/p4saKm-12



Thursday, November 12, 2015

Red crane may be preserved as bird sculpture? Sigh.


Anyone who has been following the fate of the red derrick on the Thames Path at the end of Odessa Street will be aware that it is under threat from a development that will replace that corner of derelict basketball court and former youth club, removing the problematic former nightclub at the same time.  There are benefits to the Hollybrook Home proposals, as well as potential downsides (see my summary of the consultation exhibition in an earlier post).

According to an article in Southwark News today by Joey Millar, there are now two principal options on the table for the derrick (or crane).  One is to preserve it partially by restoring the metalwork and removing inconvenient arms, leaving one arm remaining (the CGI image from Hollybrook Homes, left, shows the sort of thing envisaged).  The other is to use the metalwork to sculpt it into the form of a bird, to create a crane of the feathered variety, a sort of somewhat grizzly pun.

If the derrick has to be modified in any way, I don't see any point in doing anything other than retaining as much of it as possible.  It is either a meaningful piece of our heritage as it stands, or you might just as well give up and go home.  How on earth is a bird sculpture supposed to represent Rotherhithe's wharfinger past?  Well apparently that wouldn't be the point - the point would be to represent some sort of "aviary heritage" of which I was unaware.  I think that the word "heritage" is being used somewhat loosely here.  A local resident feels that a bird would be a "talking point" but I have no idea how that is supposed to tie in with what the red crane was all about, and what it still stands for today.

Apparently the options will be put to local residents after Christmas.  I was tempted to make a joke about turkeys, and almost stopped myself just in time.  Sigh!

Here's the Southwark News article:
http://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/beloved-odessa-street-crane-may-be-turned-into-a-bird-sculpture/



Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Update: Odessa Street / Red Crane planning proposal



This post has now moved over to my sister blog that focuses on planning and development news and issues, and can be found at:

http://wp.me/p4saKm-1e

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Floating swimming pool in Greenland Dock - countdown to end of consultation period

Hi All

Just a reminder that the consultation period for the ill thought-out planning application 15/AP/1752 for a permanent floating heated and chlorinated swimming pool, measuring 40m x 20m (125 ft x 65 feet), at Surrey Docks Watersports Centre in Greenland Dock.  The operating hours of the pool are expected to be from 6am to 10pm.  This will place it immediately in the vicinity of the Rope Street apartments and opposite Tavistock Tower and the dock-facing houses and apartments of Russia Court East.

Depending on which of Southwark Council's information sources you consult, it's the 3rd, 4th or 7th of November so I'd recommend that if you wish to submit objections, you do so by the 3rd on the Southwark Council planning page for this application.  It is very important that if you have objections you make them now by leaving your comments on the Comments page at:  http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=neighbourComments&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9560300&neighbourCommentsPager.page=1.




If allowed to go ahead it would be incredibly noisy with the sound of screaming kids carrying over the water.  Given the Dock's acoustics, the noise from the pool (and there will be a lot of noise) will be amplified and bounced around all houses surrounding the dock.  It is going to be terribly ugly too, an artificial appendage with ugly shower blocks completely out of keeping with the residential tranquillity of Greenland Dock and its heritage.  There are also potential problems with traffic and parking to add to those that will be caused by the new developments behind the watersports centre and the one planned for South Dock that will have blocks of 20, 15, 8 and 3 storeys.  There are much wider considerations too, some of which are described in a recent comment copied below:

This development conflicts with Policy 3.26 of the Southwark Plan (Borough Open Land):
(i)    The proposal is not ancillary to the use of the open space-it is a new use for the open space that would conflict with existing uses by closing off a section of water to all other users, as well as to wildlife.
(ii)    The proposal is not small in scale. A 40m x 20m development plus surrounds would have a major impact on the dock, on water users and visitors as well as residents.
(iii)    It will detract from the site's open nature and character. The design is unsympathetic to the Dock's current construction and will not "blend in".
(iv)    It is not required to enhance activities associated with Greenland Dock. In fact the development will if anything conflict with existing activities. There is no substantive information provided on the demand for this facility in the local area.
(v)    It does not positively contribute of the setting and quality of the open space. The application does not have sufficient detail to allow an informed view, but the pictures supplied suggest that the development will be visually intrusive.
The development is in our view also contrary to the following Southwark Plan
policies:

The development will add significantly to the noise impact on other users and local residents and for significantly longer periods in the day than the noise arising from current uses, contrary to Policy 3.2. There is no substantive information on proposed hours of use. Outdoor swimming pools are inevitably noisy. The surrounds of this development, being largely water and solid surfaces will amplify the noise levels unacceptably.

The development provides no assurance for the removal of the facility should it prove to be uneconomic to operate or become damaged beyond repair.  Ratepayers would then have to pay for its removal. The Council may find it very difficult to make a claim under the manufacturer's warranty unless it is fully involved in the development. The application has no information on pricing, volume estimates, capital and running costs to allow an informed assessment of the likely economics and consequent risk of closure.

It is also not possible from the information in the application to assess what the transport impacts might be and whether they would conflict with Policy 5.2.

The potential environmental impacts are significant should there be a leak of water- over the life of a facility of this type the risk of a leak must be substantial. The application has no environmental impact assessment to assess the risks systematically and to set out risk mitigations which could be the subject of planning conditions and associated enforcement measures.

There is no information on the need to store and use hazardous substances e.g. chlorine for water purification, contrary to Policy 3.10. The Dock's existing pontoons need to be scrubbed daily for bird droppings. There is no information on how the swimming pool would handle bird droppings.

There is no information on security arrangements to prevent unauthorised access to the pool when it is closed, contrary to Policy 3.14. The pool is likely to be a magnet for illicit users during the summer, with significant noise and nuisance for local residents. The current Watersports Centre security arrangements are unlikely to be sufficient.

There is no information on the energy consumption and grey water management of the development and how the methods chosen to heat the facility and recycle the water will minimise the environmental impact, contrary to Policies 3.4 and 3.9. Given the existence of a local indoor pool, there is no justification for any significant additional emissions or waste, directly or indirectly, from this development.

The development will not enhance the character or appearance of Greenland Dock, which is a historic environment, contrary to Policy 3.15

The planning details are:  15/AP/1752 -  Installation of a 40m by 20m floating, self supporting swimming pool in Greenland Dock. Greenland Dock, Watersports Centre, Rope Street, London, SE16 7SX.  The Case Officer is Dipesh Patel. Full documentation and other details are on Southwark Council's website at:
http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9560300

The documents for the case are at:
http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?casereference=15/AP/1752&system=DC



More on the future location of Canada Water’s leisure centre

A very timely email the excellent team at SE16.com.
Last week the vexed question of where a new leisure centre to replace Seven Islands should be located was the topic of a further lengthy session at Southwark’s overview & scrutiny committee.

Cllr Mark Williams (cabinet member for regeneration and new homes) and Jon Abbott (head of regeneration north) gave a presentation on the various options, including refurbishment or rebuilding on the Seven Islands site.

Watch it in full here in the SE16.com website:
http://www.se16.com/3740-more-on-the-future-location-of-canada-waters-leisure-centre

I have to admit to having been more than a little confused about the proposed location, so I'm going to grab a coffee and sit and watch it in all its glory. 


Thursday, October 22, 2015

Two SE16 Planning Applications announced in Southwark News today

I was really hoping to move away from planning issues over the next few weeks, but never mind!  There are two SE16 planning applications announced in Southwark News today the first of which will certainly be of interest to some residents. Both are categorized as "Major Planning Applications":

Ref 15/AP/4099 
Address: SURREY QUAYS LEISURE PARK, SURREY QUAYS ROAD, LONDON, SE16 1LL
http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/simpleSearchResults.do;jsessionid=6BDDAC2C126CB76028FB6D8BC8627E2C?action=firstPage
Application Received:  Thursday 08 Oct 2015 
Proposal:  Application for Reserved Matters for external appearance, landscaping and internal layout for Phase 1 comprising the construction of a basement and the construction of Block B (cinema) pursuant to condition 1 of planning permission 09-AP-1999 Outline planning permission for demolition of all existing buildings and erection of buildings ranging from 2 to 10 storeys (36.3m AOD) comprising 11,105 sqm leisure floorspace (including cinema) (Class D2), 2 695sqm retail floorspace (Class A1-A3), 49,276sqm of private and affordable residential accommodation (Class C3), 495 car parking spaces (142 for residential and 350 for leisure uses and 3 for commercial uses) and associated works including public and private open space, as well as detailed design for 123 rooms (4,240sqm) of student housing (sui generis use), 2500sqm commercial floorspace (Class B1), 86 residential units (included in the 49,276sqm referenced above) (Class C3) and the external appearance of any elevation facing Harmsworth Quays Printworks.
The documentation submitted for the application is here: http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?casereference=15/AP/4099&system=DC
There are two related cases: http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=relatedCases&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9562921
There are no comments from the public to date.  


15/AP/4180
Application Received: Friday 16 Oct 2015
Address: FORMER SURREY DOCKS STADIUM AND DEPOT ADJACENT TO STADIUM, SALTER ROAD, ROTHERHITHE, LONDON, SE16
Proposal: Variation of Condition 11 (wheelchair units) of planning permission 14-AP-0309 for: 'Redevelopment of the former Surrey Docks Stadium and land adjoining comprising demolition of existing buildings and erection of 103 residential dwellings (Use Class C3) in a series of buildings up to 4-storeys high, associated car parking and cycle parking, alterations to the existing vehicular access, enhancement to existing open space, associated landscaping, new pedestrian access/egress, and the creation of a new public park with associated works' to remove reference to the marketing of wheelchair adaptable units.
There are two associated documents here: http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?casereference=15/AP/4180&system=DC
There are two related cases: http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=relatedCases&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9563021